this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

4067 readers
103 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The suit was filed in 2022, but the claims are still open until October 28.

If you've ever shopped for the best RAM, you've seen speeds such as DDR4-3600 or DDR4-6400, and even higher. Those numbers represent the rated speed, and they're the headline feature that justifies premium pricing. However, these speeds aren't the default operating mode of the sticks—they're overclocking profiles that require manual enablement in the BIOS. Your CPU does not officially support them, and not every system can run its memory subsystem at those speeds with flawless stability. That gap between marketing and reality is what led Corsair to a class-action lawsuit in 2022.

The complaint, titled "McKinney et al. v. Corsair Gaming, Inc.," argued that Corsair's Vengeance and Dominator DDR4/DDR5 modules were sold with the advertised speeds printed front-and-center without clearly disclosing that the out-of-box default is the JEDEC standard (DDR4-2133 for DDR4, and DDR5-4800 for DDR5). While most systems based on enthusiast-grade DIY hardware are capable of achieving significant memory overclocks, the facts remain that the advertised numbers require firmware tweaking, and results vary based on the CPU, motherboard, and luck of the silicon lottery.

Corsair denied any wrongdoing, but after more than three years of litigation, a proposed settlement is now moving forward in federal court. If it gets final approval, Corsair will pay out $5.5 million USD and add clearer messaging to its memory packaging and product pages, including "up to" language for transfer rates and disclaimers concerning the overclocked nature of the RAM. The settlement covers U.S. purchasers of certain Corsair DDR4 and DDR5 desktop memory kits sold between 2018 and 2025. [...]

(this is from a couple of weeks ago)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Highlow@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Sweet. Maybe I can buy a 20oz Dr Pepper with that