this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
13 points (93.3% liked)

Hardware

4099 readers
331 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why are people still picking Nvidia anymore?

As one example, NVIDIA Optix unfortunately beats everything else for path tracing. Maybe AMD is fine for gaming, but if the goal is the most cost effective hardware for a Blender Flamenco render farm, for example, you’re stuck with NVIDIA for the moment. I’d love a better alternative, though.

AMD doesn’t even show up in this list until the end of the second page. The M3 benchmarks are encouraging, but the price for a Mac with a 80 core M3 Ultra is several grand vs $800 for a 5070 Ti with a similar score, so it isn’t exactly a compelling NVIDIA alternative at the moment.

VRAM is the main downside of NVIDIA, since larger scenes regularly exceed 8Gi and it may very well worth buying g a lower powered card to get more VRAM.

https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/query/?compute_type=OPTIX&compute_type=CUDA&compute_type=HIP&compute_type=METAL&compute_type=ONEAPI&group_by=device_name&blender_version=4.5.0