this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
46 points (96.0% liked)
Opensource
4062 readers
187 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hope this encourages the remaining Ruby devs to move to languages that aren't quite so awful to work with. Even Python is significantly better at this point, now that
uv
has mostly solved the tooling disaster.it has more sane syntax than python and is great for e. g. webscrapping
As someone who dislikes Python, I can't say I agree. So, I will use Python, but I only use it for 3 lines of code snips to test before making codes on other languages.
I mean mainly list manipulation, with explicit filter, map, reduce mathods.
I've also never had a problem with not knowing if I closed enough parentheses in Ruby.
i wonder why nobody thought to do the things that uv does before... (obviously i'm talking about its features here, not rust. it's crazy good)
They certainly tried (see Poetry, Pyenv, Conda, etc.). But that was mostly done by Python developers in Python, which is frankly the entire problem.
Yeah I know Poetry. The problem is Poetry sucked. I don't remember exactly how but it left a realllly bad taste in my mouth, and not because of speed. And I don't recall other solutions thinking to provide aliases for python and pip commands either.