this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1 points (54.5% liked)
AI - Artificial intelligence
156 readers
8 users here now
AI related news and articles.
Rules:
- No Videos.
- No self promotion: Don't post links to your articles.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For a system that has such high cost (to the environment, to the vendor, to the end user in the form of subscription), that's a damningly low level of reliability.
If my traditional code editor's code completion feature is even 0.001% unreliable – say it emits a name that just isn't in my code base – that feature is broken and needs to be fixed. If I have to start doubting whether the feature works every time I use it, that's not an acceptable tool to rely on.
Why would we accept far worse reliability in a tool that consumes gargantuan amounts of power, water, political effort, and comes with a high subscription fee?