this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
280 points (90.0% liked)

memes

17645 readers
2595 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know how relevant this is now, but here's a link to another post where I expressed my thoughts on what kind of pitfalls you might most likely face -- https://lemmy.world/post/36867409

By the way, what is this phenomenon on Lemmy? Let's say people are reluctant to read and comment on old posts published just a couple of days or a week ago, but with new ones, it's a completely different story. What kind of psychology is this? Or it seemed to me?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you print £100 and give it to every person, then yes. But if you tax every person with progressive taxation so that the poor pay little or no tax, and then give everyone £100 using the proceeds, no, because you are changing the distribution of resource-allocation-units between the people who had the most and the least of them previously.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Even in the former example the inflation hits the billionaire harder than the worker. For example if we all got a trillion dollars it wouldn't really matter that Elon has a trillion and a half. Scale that same principle down and UBI is good for the workers.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree that inflation hits billionaires harder, they invest their money in the stock market which outpaces the rate of inflation Year over Year. Meanwhile, your total buying power drops tremendously because of inflation’s increase each year. If most of your money isn’t in the stock market then the worth of your money continues to be less. If you don’t get a wage increase at your job, then you’re making less money each year rather than the same amount as well.

I do agree that UBI is good for workers though, mainly because it also puts power back in the hands of workers since they become not dependent on their employers to survive. Workers instead would be coming into work because they want to thrive.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago

I didn't say all inflation hits billionaires harder. Just inflation from UBI. Inflation from stock growth hits workers harder, and that's why we need wage growth and UBI growth to outperform stock growth.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The "price increases" side of inflation harms the people that hold money.

Billionaires do hold more than poor people, but they still mostly don't hold any. It's normally the high-middle class and the poorest fraction of the rich that are hit the most here. You need proper taxation to reach the billionaires.