this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
194 points (99.0% liked)

World News

50204 readers
2170 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Uhhhh, how about try? If the options are to euthanize them or give them a fighting chance in the wild, they should just release them near or around another pod. The hubris of man to think animals can’t survive without them. They aren’t domesticated. If they’re hungry and see a fish swim by they’d be like “where’s the hairless ape’s hand to feed me?”.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

It's not the hubris of man. It's scientific research over decades and decades that has shown many captive animals are unable to survive without humans. This isn't just some hippy or business person making uninformed assumptions about how animals work. Animals who have never been taught how to hunt on their own, or how to communicate with others of their species, will slowly die of starvation. It happens all the time when animals are let loose in the wild with no skills.

If you don't believe me, go watch Naked and Afraid. Nearly every episode is about how these adult humans who have a production team ensuring their safety can't catch any food and get sick from bad water and mostly starve for the entire duration of the challenge. That's what captive animals are like. They have grown up with nobody to teach them anything useful. The only people who do well on the show are those who have had years of training in how to survive in the wild.

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not a marine biologist, so I can't speculate on what the best alternative is for these whales, but I would like to imagine there are more options than the binary of "kill them" or "throw them to the ~~wolves~~ sharks".

Marineland is just parroting the euthanize option because they're upset they couldn't make a quick buck by selling them to China. It's a hissy fit tactic to try to un-block the sale.

If the whales are not able to be released in to the wild, I'm sure there are plenty of other facilities out there that would be able to care for them. Marineland might need to pay them to take the animals in, but it should be their obligation to do so if they're unable to support the quality of life they need themselves.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Hey, man! What do you have against sharks? They need food too. Euthanize them and OSHA and 9 other agencies will have a say in how the carcasses are disposed of “safely”.

I do agree with you though, I wish the options weren’t so binary.