Programmer Humor

26846 readers

1599 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

423

submitted 5 days ago by rikudou@lemmings.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] four@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Shouldnt it be return UUID { uuid: uuid.uuid } ?

I think it would make more sense AND more uuid per UUID

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first UUID is a local type, the second is the name of an embedded struct, the third is the name of the variable.

The struct looks something like this (writing this on my phone)

type UUID struct { uuid.UUID }

So, basically, this is a custom wrapper for a third party UUID implementation.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Ahh, that makes sense then

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

I'm assuming it's a map/dictionary notation here, rather than a type hint