this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
350 points (98.9% liked)

Comic Strips

19677 readers
1101 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If I paint a study of Van Gogh’s Starry Night, even though I painted it it’s NOT my art. Trying to sell a reproduction without acknowledgment that I’m not the original artist is forgery and fraud.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If I paint a study of Van Gogh’s Starry Night, even though I painted it it’s NOT my art. Trying to sell a reproduction without acknowledgment that I’m not the original artist is forgery and fraud.

you're still looking at art through the lens (window, frame) of today, my comment was to remind that this proprietary way of seeing art wasn't always the norm. "Original artist" is itself a product of the market. There were no fraudsters, only artisans making images.

Van Gogh is an interesting example, whose paintings wasn't worth a cent during his life. Others, later on, profited from his work.

Art world itself is full of absurd examples working on these ideas. (Latest must be the Comedian.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 5 days ago

So the images in the book were intentional recreations of existing, discrete pieces of art?