this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
122 points (98.4% liked)

news

380 readers
972 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fodderoh@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the narrowest reading of the article, maybe. But as I said the House already passed their bill. It is in the Senate's hands now. But since the Senate requires a supermajority, they need some level of Dem support to pass it. And since anything the Senate passes would have to go back to the House for reconciliation, House leadership is very much involved in those negotiations (or lack thereof) since they would have to line up support in their own chamber. And that is what the article is talking about. Not just the House, but the negotiations as a whole and Johnson's part in it. (Or refusal to participate as seems to be the case.)

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

isnt MTG also voting against him, ?