this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
1217 points (99.6% liked)

World News

50503 readers
1319 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Ireland's $1,500-a-month basic income pilot program for creatives nears its end in February, officials have to answer a simple question: Is it worth it?

With four months to go, they say the answer is yes.

Earlier this month, Ireland's government announced its 2026 budget, which includes "a successor to the pilot Basic Income Scheme for the Arts to begin next year" among its expenditures.

Ireland is just one of many places experimenting with guaranteed basic income programs, which provide recurring, unrestricted payments to people in a certain demographic. These programs differ from a universal basic income, which would provide payments for an entire population.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verdi@feddit.org 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Either UBI for everyone or UBI for no one. Lest we forget, money for this comes from of decades of collaboration in European tax avoidance by greedy multinational corporations to avoid paying their fair share in the other EU countries they operate in.

Otherwise, UBI is a great idea.

edit: "-excludes for example journalism or books for educational purposes, for example: textbooks, technical manuals, writing created for advertising or publicity purposes."

Yeah, you wouldn't want journalism or education to be freely accessible as an ocupation... This has to be the most ridiculous ubi experiment in the last decade.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Ireland has a history of supporting artists, mostly with large tax breaks for ARTISTS. While journalists and scholars use writing extensively in their careers, they are not "artists" in the way that people tend to think of that concept. They are not creating art, they are creating knowledge. That's an honorable endeavor, but it is not strictly art.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

mostly with large tax breaks for ARTISTS

i mean yeah that barely costs ireland anything as artists are typically poor and therefore barely pay taxes anyways ... /s

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

Except that it has attracted major artists, with major fortunes, such as Rod Stewart.

[–] verdi@feddit.org -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't implying journalism is art, I'm implying no government is going to give you the tools to depose them.

Regarding "ARTISTS", let's see how many of the supported artists actually develop a craft rather than just producing content.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Many many many popular historical artists were not popular in their own time. The if it's be an artist or go work for a living, that's still people paying for things in their communities for however long that is. It's entirely worth it even if they just create content. It's a fair place to start imho

[–] verdi@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The overwhelming majority of the EU population works in services industries, whereas we lack specialized tradespeople like construction specialists. If forced to choose, I'd rather see that UBI go to them to support an early retirement plan for those underapreciated classes that have physically demanding work. Anyone can be an artist, especially if we don't need to have two jobs to make rent.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Perfect being the enemy of good.

Man it's gotta got to start somewhere. The full value of such a system will not be seen in our life times.

But if "anyone can be an artist" I'll argue then that is actually the very best place to start this.

Young, old, decrepit, disadvantages, anyone can claim an artist UBI? Fucking great! That sounds like a feature not a bug

Work on your own terms, your own needs, within your own choices. Fucking great.

I've lived where the first thing they gets cut from every budget is the Arts.

That certainly hasn't made the world a better place to live because "work" is always going to be a dog eat dog world where you don't collaborate you compete. Your usefulness is only determined by how much value can be extracted from you without a care for your well being.

Arts are useless? Can't make rent with an arts degree? Well guess what now everyone can.

I really don't understand why you are so pissed about this and seemingly(my interpretation, I could be wrong) uninterested in looking at how this can be good the way it is.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

We already have basic income but just for some people. Would it be better to abolish those programs or keep them?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Either UBI for everyone or UBI for no one.

UBI for some.

Little American flags for others