this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
575 points (94.4% liked)

Political Weirdos

1260 readers
8 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Clearly you aren’t splitting hairs enough. Take your good and add an “ism”… then multiply it by a couple “ists”… and finally divide it by purity…

And the result is basically the same fucking thing, but with a remainder that gives excuses for simple minded folks to disagree…

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, sometimes it is just bargaining chips. Otherwise they have to classify the Richard Nixon administration as being progressive for voting to give women the right to open credit accounts without a male co-signer.