this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
6 points (59.4% liked)
Opensource
4212 readers
375 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I use Zen as well, but I dont like the idea of calling any browser fork "privacy focused". It only takes one malicious update and your entire online life can be exfilled to wherever.
You can sue Mozilla/Google/MS (maybe unsuccessfully, depends on functional courts) if something goes wrong there, you cannot sue a random github repo.
I max the settings on strictest privacy and I have extensions to manage the voids that may be there
Won't help if the browser exfils your data. You have to trust the browser no matter what.
Have you found an actual flaw in privacy?
No, this is (to my knowledge anyway) a theoretical problem. But it is very much a real risk, as demonstrated by the
xzbackdoor.We should be very careful who we trust, especially for browsers, because a compromise could be catastrophic.
I'm always cautious of all software. So fair warning
The attack surface is the flaw. The chain of trust is the flaw/risk.
Who's behind the project? Who has control? How's the release handled? What are the risks and vulnerabilities of the entirely product delivery?
It's much more obvious and established/vetted with Mozilla. With any other fork product, you first have to evaluate it yourself.