Politics

949 readers

257 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

565

Arizona AG sues Mike Johnson for refusing to swear in Democrat for weeks (www.salon.com)

submitted 1 week ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed a lawsuit against House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Tuesday following a continuous refusal by Johnson to seat Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva., D-Ariz.

The 17-page lawsuit filed in Washington on Monday seeks to compel Johnson to swear in Grijalva, or for another official in the House to do so. Mayes warns that allowing Johnson to avoid seating Grijalva would “thwart” the will of voters.

“This case is about whether someone duly elected to the House who indisputably meets the constitutional qualifications of the office,” Mayers wrote in the filing, “may be denied her rightful office simply because the Speaker has decided to keep the House out of ‘regular session.’”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I don't understand what happens if the courts side with Arizona. It seems that Mike can ignore the court wishes and not swear her in. Was is the path of escalation if he continues to ignore it?

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 47 points 1 week ago

Contempt of court for failing to abide by the ruling. But of course that can be put off as it goes through appeals for a while.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago

That's the fun part about turning a democracy into a fascist regime, nothing happens. Systemic checks and balances are just busywork for the weak.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

This one is about the release of the Epstein files and Congress. Multiple Republicans in Congress are in support of releasing the files and Trump doesn't have the power to ignore or lose their votes yet.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

I was on a town hall call with my senator and we told him we're cool with the shutdown, and that we should withhold federal taxes. He was on board for both.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Johnson will be receiving the strongest worded letter Schumer can muster including heavily bolded fonts, so you know it means business.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tantrums?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

That'll show 'em!

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If law is shown to not matter anymore, one could get "funny" ideas...

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Oh, it still does matter, just not to everyone.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't mind seeing a chalk outline that is shaped like a Johnson.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It sounds like someone else might be able to swear her in then. I think…?