this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
3195 readers
152 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That means they are.
Any time a company, hell even an individual, refuses to give an answer you can just assume it's the worst option. That's why they don't want to say it.
Correct. It’s the same as the logic being destroying or hiding evidence (see: Epstein files). It’s because the evidence is exactly what you think it is, or worse. They aren’t keeping it from you because it’s not as bad as you think. So you can safely assume that it is.
This is more of a canary system, but a little different. Canary is where they constantly say “we’re not sharing your data” and then one day they remove that text. They’re not saying they are, but they’re not saying they’re not — and they used to.
Or it’s code wording. “Never say you’re fine, say you’re okay,” a family sets as a rule. So when they’re fine, when everything’s going well, they say in the group chat they’re okay. Then an aggressor demands one tell the rest they’re safe when they aren’t, so they say everything is fine and that sounds the alarm.
Cryptocommunication is fun.
That's their secret. They always were.