Funny

12180 readers

1285 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

336

Questions from Court (infosec.pub)

submitted 6 days ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Know your audience. You'd think attorneys were better at that, but I guess witnesses don't decide whether someone gets made attorney or not.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it's a funny meeting of worlds thing. Like the kinda of people who can afford law school are generally not the kinds who grew up in an every day setting

Colloquial speech vs professional jargon

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 17 points 6 days ago

Also a lot of what (good) trial lawyers do is cover all the small loopholes, so questions that seem silly are because Dr X-acto got off on murder by claiming it was an autopsy in 1798 or whatever. Or it's a bad trial lawyer and it is silly.