this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
961 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

9789 readers
2084 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Going high", in this case referring to using democratic principles to govern? That's not going high, that's how the system is supposed to work.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Things are so bad that 'not cheating' is taking the high road, yeah

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, they are cheating, just with the blessing of the public. Like gerrymandering isn't a thing you should be able to do, fullstop, but it isn't something normally possible to do in California.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Working within a broken system isn't cheating though. Cheating means you're breaking the rules.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, there's a California rule that states that redistricting is done by a non-partisan commission. This explicitly sidesteps that process. They're breaking a rule with permission but they're still breaking a rule.

If your DM rules that you can have two actions in a turn without reason, it's still cheating.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'd argue this is explicitly not cheating. Revising the rules though a democratic process IS democracy.

The D&D example is closer since it doesn't explicitly call for buy-in from the whole table, but the first and only rule of D&D is to have fun with the DM being chief facilitator. The PHB and DMG are just suggestions. If this favoritism caused others in the party to feel slighted, then it would be 'cheating'.