this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2283 readers
105 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
17
Oxford pretends AI benchmarks are science, not marketing (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 3 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

How could all these benchmarks be fake, it’s a mystery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcYZN6sTZjQ&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251106-oxford-pretends-ai-benchmarks-are-science-not-marketing - podcast

time: 6 min 16 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago

I’m gonna say it: The entire “artificial intelligence”/“machine learning” research field is corrupt. They have institutionally accepted the bullshit fountain as a tool. It doesn’t matter if they’re only using chatbots as a “pilot program”; they’ve bought into the ideology. They’ve granted fashtech a seat at the bar and forced all the other customers to shake its hand.

Abso-fucking-lutely. Oxford's latest "research paper" isn't marketing - its propaganda. Propaganda for bullshit fountains, and for the ideology which endorses them.