Linux Questions

2845 readers

6 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip

How do you feel about Flatpak? Do you like having universal packages separated from the operating system, or do you regret how much space they take? (piefed.zip)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was reading a bit about it recently, seems like there two positions are valid, curious to see what people here think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck Fedora/FESCO for repacking flathub flatpaks as their own and forcing users to use their remote instead of flathub. That's really my only feelings.

Anyway, as an Atomic Bazzite user, I love Flathub-remote flatpaks. And I love that UniversalBlue strips out yucky Fedora remote, out-of-the-box.

Means I don't have to yuck up my image with more rpm OSTree layers. Bazaar is awesome. 😉

[–] aesopjah@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

you can add flathub as a repo on fedora. ofc it would be nice if it was defaulted tho