this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
354 points (100.0% liked)

News

33136 readers
2579 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • A petition in the House of Representatives to force a vote to release the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files secured the last signature required to trigger that action.

  • Rep. Adelita Grilalva, D-Ariz., provided the 218th signature needed to approve the petition shortly after she was sworn in as a House member, after weeks of delay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 52 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Next it goes to the senate. Which will need 60 votes. We know that's not happening.

If it does pass the Senate, it goes to Trump's desk. That's a veto 100%.

Oversight committees can delay and block subpoenas to get the files.

DOJ can refuse to comply.

These are the main factors. So will we get the files? Probably not. But it'll put Republicans on the spot for them.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Next it goes to the senate. Which will need 60 votes. We know that's not happening.

Procedurally and realistically you're correct. However technically the "nuclear option" exists to reduce that to a simple majority. There is a 0% chance that will happen, since it didn't happen to end the 40+ day shutdown, no one is going to use it here.

Plus even if you did, Trump would veto it and it would all be for nothing, as you said.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming the bill gets passed in the House, it would still require approval by the Senate and to be signed into law by President Donald Trump. Senate GOP leaders have not guaranteed they would hold a vote in their chamber.

But Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the co-sponsor of the bill with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), told reporters Wednesday he believed “40 to 50" Republicans would join Democrats in supporting the bill in the House.

“If we get that kind of overwhelming vote, that’s going to push the Senate, and it’s going to push for a release of the files from the Justice Department,” Khanna said.

Trump officials are still waging an intense pressure campaign to get at least one of three House Republican women to remove their name from the discharge effort, according to two people granted anonymity to share private conversations. If that push is successful, it would complicate efforts to get the measure on the floor in the first place, as Republicans are more likely to vote in favor of the legislation itself than they are to sign onto a discharge petition seen as an outwardly antagonistic gesture toward leadership.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

There’s so many moving parts and so much corruption within the system. I don’t have high hopes for this, but I hope our rapist-in-chief gets what’s coming to him.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

Remember, releasing the files is extremely popular with Republican voters, to the point where anyone who votes no is going to look like they're basically in bed with the evil deep state pedophile cabal hiding under the pizza parlor.

That means for them to kill it in the House, a whole bunch of GOP reps have to face a firestorm from their constituents.

If it does in the Senate, it's because they let that firestorm spread to every GOP senator too.

And if it makes it to Trump, and he's forced to veto it? That might just be the final nail in his presidency. His polularity is already tanking. This could kill it completely.

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Certainly agree on the veto. But I feel like this is a perfect chance to split the opposition. Not going to pretend how that political ammunition would best be used, but it seems endless.