this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
631 points (95.0% liked)

Games

22039 readers
157 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone is saying that billionaires existing is a good thing.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Then why praise one for having a pet project just because it might help the environment? If it's not a good thing that they exist, why does there need to be a caveat of "but he's doing good things with his money."

[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

It is possible to acknowledge that a billionaire is doing a good thing with his ungodly wealth, while also saying that he should not have that level of wealth to begin with.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

It's not "but", it's "at least".