this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
631 points (95.0% liked)

Games

22039 readers
329 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
631
Gabe Newell caps off Steam Machine week by taking delivery of a new $500 million superyacht with a submarine garage, on-board hospital and 15 gaming PCs (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 days ago by misk@piefed.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
431 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean how? The concept of a billionaire existing being bad has a massive relevance as to whether one individual a billionaire is bad. If the mere fact of being a billionaire is bad, which it obviously is, then it doesn't matter who this individual billionaire is he's already tainted by being a billionaire. That's just one plus one equals two. It's inescapable logic. Of course it's relevant.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the mere fact of being a billionaire is bad, which it obviously is,

I don't think that's obvious at all. Becoming a billionaire just means you have a billion dollars worth of assets, and it doesn't say anything about how you got that money.

There's a high correlation between billionaire's and being a bad person, but it's not 1:1.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not going to get sidetracked into that conversation. Especially when there is absolutely zero chance of us agreeing on it. The topic was whether or not that determination is relevant. Which again obviously it has to be.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And I argue it's not a given that someone is a bad person just because they have billions of dollars.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Cool beans dude, not what we were talking about. We were talking about whether or not that determination is relevant.