this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
820 points (97.3% liked)

Today I Learned

25766 readers
658 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The housing market crash, I believe was a lost opportunity. When the US government had to bail out banks, why did it not ask for those houses that went belly up. Could have started a social housing aid, here it could sell luxury homes to buy low cost housing to give to its most vulnerable citizens. It paid for those houses using people's tax dollars, why not use it for the benefit of the people

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

because that's socialism.

the concept of federal public housing was basically made illegal in the 90s by the welfare reform acts.

the federal government can't do this by law. legally it is not allowed to increase the number of public housing units beyond those that existed in 1998. it's called the Faircloth amendement.

[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bailing out companies is also not capitalism, ideally should have left them then to go bankrupt

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

yeah but it's legal.

[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Like then at least their assets would have been sold to cover their losses. This way your government is not socialism but it is choosing who are the winners, since they cannot lose

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because Republicans were in charge when the bank bailout happened. At least the automaker one under Obama had them pay it back with interest.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

We can be real and admit that democrats also don't have an appetite for government housing like that. They had the chance to hold bankers to account for the massive fuck up and decided to not to.