this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
113 points (98.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

65256 readers
220 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I should have acknowledged that in my highly rhetorical line of questioning, but are we going to pretend road tax covers the full cost of roads? It'd have to be much higher if it did, and it still wouldn't cover the environmental cost of runoff and emissions, nor all the squandered space from parking minimums, etc.

These costs always get externalised to a large extent and we pretend we're doing something normal because moneyed interests have made it the default option. But we're not.

[–] Nanzer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In my state at least millions in federal funding goes towards projects. Day to day operations are funded by state tax dollars and they still want people to pay ever increasing prices for public transport.

Honytawks argument further falls flat when you consider tax dollars do go to public transport.

Edit:clarified state tax vs federal