this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
347 points (98.6% liked)

Data is Beautiful

2889 readers
72 users here now

Be respectful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social -3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Quite a selective sample for such a big claim

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are abo 25% of countries in there and it doesn't look like doctored data and agrees with lived experience. Your claims are baseless.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you concerned that nothing in your reply addresses whether the countries were chosen to support a trend?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No pattern is obvious. There are no backwater countries, but otherwise most important ones are in there. You cannot plausibly cherry pick this effect while choosing so very many countries. A large part of global gdp is in there.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

I can only laugh at this. "Most important countries", yes no pattern.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What claim exactly? Its say around the world and lists countries that span the globe. Seems accurate. Plus it represents the majority of the population.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is one African country and nothing from the middle east.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The most populous African country by a significant margin and Turkey is often counted as middle east.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right, but microscopic European populations are still included because they support the thesis.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow your argument sure keeps changing in every response. I think there is a phrase for that...

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 0 points 19 hours ago

Not understanding stuff, maybe there's a term for that.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So? You are reading things into the data and effectively turning it into a strawman. It isn't presenting an argument, it is presenting data. You are being oversensitive and inferring an argument, and then criticizing that argument, but it doesn't even exist.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

Presenting data is an argument. Because you decide what data to present and how. If you leave out data that doesn't support a statement you made based on data you present, then there is an issue.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not quite sure how these countries were selected, but the set does touch on many regions and the very biggest ones.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but only a single African country and none from the middle east.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. And subsaharan Africa is a loss, because I'm guessing it's the place bucking the trend. I wouldn't go quite as far as "selective", though, since that implies intentionality or completely different results.

I would guess that the rest of MENA looks a lot like Turkey, if you could manage to safely poll it - a starting point that's uniformly hostile, but a few people being swayed by progressive influence over time. Religious belief of the younger generations is also descending faster than anywhere else IIRC.

North Korea would also be fascinating, with a magic wand.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you leave out data that bucks a trend you like, then you are being selective.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

since that implies intentionality or completely different results.

I don't really see evidence of either. Many minor countries elsewhere are neglected as well, and it's still a global trend.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So it's a global trend based on non-global data carefully selected to leave out anything that doesn't agree?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's also just a global trend anecdotally, and probably based on other research that's been done. And it almost certainly does extend to MENA for reasons I mentioned. This is one of those infographics that's not really surprising.

based on non-global data carefully selected to leave out anything that doesn’t agree?

Basically, asked and answered.

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol, indeed.

Edit: Thanks, I unsubbed this feed. Scientific illiterates masturbating over how "objective" their data is.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Okay, have a great day.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well homosexuality is illegal in much of North Africa and the Middle East, so running a poll might get you in trouble

[–] Wigners_friend@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

A reasonable point, but extremely difficult to square with the claim made by the OP. Also, the rest of Africa exists.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And subsaharan Africa, including Nigeria I think.

Edit: Yep, punishable by hard time in the Christian south, and death in the Muslim north. Other Christian nations down there have brought in the death penalty over time.