this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
631 points (95.0% liked)

Games

22039 readers
126 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
631
Gabe Newell caps off Steam Machine week by taking delivery of a new $500 million superyacht with a submarine garage, on-board hospital and 15 gaming PCs (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 days ago by misk@piefed.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
431 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I figured it was something like that, no big.

To answer your question, the idea there is that the average market take is 30%- valve takes 30%, apple, google, microsoft, sony, nintendo, etc etc all take 30%. Physical publishers take more, but for eshops, 30% is 'standard.'

EGS does 12%, but they:

  1. Don't have as many features/smaller team/less servers/etc
  2. Are losing money on EGS, it's solely being propped up by Fortnite money
  3. Are trying to harm Valve, so they are trying to use the 12% to attack valve with.

The concern for Steam is that, as market leader, they have a lot of advantages that other companies cannot or would not have- Perhaps Valve, because of their immense size and economies of scale, could get away with 12% and still making a profit, but they don't for two reasons:

  1. Lets be real here, they don't have to.
  2. If Valve only did a 12% take, nobody else could compete with that because nobody else is big enough to.

2 seems a bit paradoxial, but the idea here is that Valve doesn't want to use it's market position in a way that prevents other, smaller companies from being able to compete, because that is a monopoly. Valve wants to be market leader, NOT a monopoly, because that is obviously illegal.

So it's safer for them to stay at the 'market average' that other companies CAN compete with, and obviously they benefit anyway, because there's really no gain for them to lower their own percentage. THey could get accused of monopoly abuse, they lower their take, and doing so wouldn't gain them any market share.