this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
166 points (96.1% liked)

Games

22039 readers
370 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
166
Nearly half of US kids want in-game currency this Christmas (www.gamesindustry.biz)
submitted 11 hours ago by misk@piefed.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Its not the parents fault, its just how its going.

As a kid I wanted pokemon cards, because all the other kids had pokemon cards and were showing off how many pokemon cards they had and it was on TV that you GOTTA CATCH EM ALL and the cool kid had a shiny raichu and I was a loser because I didnt have one so I really wanted one so I needed pokemon cards.

It didnt mean my parents failed me. It means toy manufacturers have all but weaponised marketing/propaganda and children are especially susceptible.

In my example, replace shiny raichu card with Peter Griffin skin.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

yeah. it's like saying you shouldn't give you kid a smart phone.

you will basically destroy their social development because literally every kid has one. and the worst thing for a kid is to be socially excluded. children desperately crave peer acceptance.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It means toy manufacturers have all but weaponised marketing/propaganda and children are especially susceptible.

When exactly does it switch over to be weaponized? What is the line?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

South Park pretty much nailed it in the chinpokomon episode