this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

4347 readers
423 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 10 points 20 hours ago

I understand the need for full detailed reasoning, but that legalese document is not approachable or accessible.

I wish they had at least given a plain language summary of the changes they intend to make. For full reasoning you could still refer to the whole document.

I guess I'll trust the EFF in their interpretation.


Numerous invalid patents have been granted in the past, and had to be challenged to be corrected.
These suggested changes are horrendous for a just or sustainable patent system.
There may be opportunities for change or efficiency gains, but blocking and evading challenges in various ways is not a good approach. It excessively favors patent trolls which act maliciously and damaging to other companies, the economy and society at large.