Linux

10229 readers

773 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

281

Self-Hosters Confirm It Again: Linux Dominates the Homelab OS Space (linuxiac.com)

submitted 1 day ago by cm0002 to c/linux@programming.dev

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ethan Sholly, the driving force behind selfh.st, one of the most recognized communities uniting self-hosting enthusiasts, has published the latest results of his annual survey on the community’s preferences, collecting 4,081 responses from self-hosting practitioners worldwide.

No surprise there: Linux is overwhelmingly dominant, chosen by more than four out of five self-hosters (81%). In other words, for self-hosters operating at bare-metal, virtualised, or container-based infrastructure, Linux remains the backbone.

In fact, this result aligns closely with broader trends: according to Wikipedia, Linux holds a 63% share of global server infrastructure. Aside from the hobby aspect, most respondents said privacy was their main reason for self-hosting, which, as you know, remains one of Linux’s strongest selling points. Now, back to the numbers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lots of shitty techs are afraid of the command line. Lots of companies also just have an AD server and nothing more these days.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In my experience as a Windows sysadmin, AD and HyperV are the big two.

I will espouse support for AD readily, it's very good at what it does and connects with M365 with minimal setup. HyperV is also a perfectly cromulent hypervisor, but in that space, They all serve the same function and none I've worked with really have a killer feature that sets it apart from the others.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

I will espouse support for AD readily, it’s very good at what it does and connects with M365 with minimal setup.

That's why they EEE'd LDAP: vendor lock-in. It's MS.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Active Directory is a monster. Got downvoted to hell the other day for saying there is nothing out there that comes close for managing a fleet of machines. Most of the idiot arguments revolved around thinking AD is fancy LDAP.

"Linux and Mac can do authentication!"

If one's view of AD is that limited, we're not having the same conversation. Cross connect AD with Powershell and Hyper-V, you have a robust ecosystem for enterprise. And there are zero issues with running headless Linux servers on Hyper-V.

[–] SinTan1729@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have no experience in sysadmin work, but have some understanding of the Linux tools used. Can you eli5 what exactly is it that AD does? (Feel free not to, I just couldn't find a good article, so decided to ask.)

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Nah - that’s not the reason. And the companies that «just have an ad server» has most of their stuff in the cloud and at saas providers. Those servers are not «ad servers».