this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
436 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26466 readers
2847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A lot of millionaire wealth is tied to where they live. A New York lawyer or doctor can't just move to Miami and expect to have the same level. Business owners could potentially move, but they still would need to keep traveling back and forth. Ultimately, their social life and lifestyle is where they already liveand being the one who moved because "is expensive" it would be seen as cheap.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FYI when we’re talking about taxing the rich and wealth we’re not talking about doctors and lawyers even if they still make a fuck ton because they are still getting paid for their labour and they need to work in order to maintain their lifestyle even if they would be considered rich.

What we’re talking about are people who make their living through their capital I.e. due to the exploitation of other people.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This article is about an income tax. An additional 4% tax on income over 1 million dollars annually.

This article is not about a wealth tax.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2% according to the article, not 4%.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Voters narrowly approved a 4% surtax on incomes over $1 million in a statewide ballot referendum in November 2022.

??

[–] shane@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I was referring to the article in the post. You were referring to the article in the comment. 🙃

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Nice, now everyone is correct. Love to see it!

[–] davad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A quick search suggests most New York lawyers (avg $176k/yr) and surgeons (avg $300k to $750k) aren't going to be be affected.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah. We usually consider lawyers, doctors, tech people, academics at fancy universities etc. to be rich. But in the grand scheme of things, they're upper middle class at best. The real rich are all people with generational wealth coming from businesses.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who considered these people to be rich? Rich people don't have to work. Those are working professionals. Manny of them have high debts for the beginning decade of their careers, too

People born before the 2010s, roughly. Doctors and lawyers were at one point considered two of the highest earning professions and it's only been recently that college debt has really been considered a real issue rather than an excuse Millennials made up because they would rather complain about being poor than lift themselves up by their bootstraps.

For the Baby Boomers, these professions allowed them to buy lots of assets that have since appreciated in value and become generational wealth, and they think the world still works that way.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This is not about wealth though, but income instead.
I doubt those income millionaires can just leave New York and be better off than paying an additional 2% income tax while staying in NY.
In all likeliness they'd have much more net loss from leaving NY than from additional measly 2% tax.