this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
664 points (98.8% liked)

196

5686 readers
812 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

If they spent every available dollar they had on yachts, then trickle-down economics would work. But, obviously they don't.

On the other hand, if you hand a poor person $1000, it's going to be spent almost immediately. Debts will be paid off, essential repairs will be done, groceries will be purchased, family members in need will be helped. That money won't "trickle down" because there's no "down" from there, but it will quickly spread across the economy.

There is some value in giving a rich person, or a rich company money. Poor people aren't able to make investments in the future because they have so many pressing immediate needs. A person or company might put some money towards something that won't pay off for years or maybe decades. So, there's some value in that. With too much money, investments are no longer smart because it doesn't matter anymore.