this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

TechTakes

2305 readers
199 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 3 days ago (6 children)

it happened again, I Posted. dash of thread to it too. some of y’all may enjoy

and yes that capital P is load bearing

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I have some thoughts about this goober (Simon Willison) that I need to get out of my head:

First the positives:

  • I think he's actually an experienced software engineer.
  • I think he care to check and test the LLM output.

But, by his own admission:

  • He uses LLM for tasks he knows well (So easier to check and little negative impact on learning)
  • He works mostly on hobby projects (so no obligation to actually maintain the stuff)
  • He can choose to not use new libraries (which in a professional setting is not always a luxury you can afford)

Tl;dr: an experienced dev who uses clankers to churn out tons of technically functional hobby software and thinks this gives him right to speak for all software engineers.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's also found a lucrative niche being the "serious" AI booster. No doubt he gets something from it, if nothing else consulting work.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago

I think he's just a true believer (or very good at lying).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)