this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
555 points (98.4% liked)
memes
18251 readers
2303 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But what if instead of adding a third dimension by going UP, you add a third dimension by going FORWARD. Like a computer screen, X and Y coordinates are side-to-side and up-and-down. If you made a volumetric display by adding a third dimension to that, Y would be up and Z would be forward.
I usually think of Z as up, because that’s how stuff based on the physical world usually works. But I can understand why some think of it with Y as up.
Third dimension isn't up, it's just not X or Y. We just say "height" or synonyms for it because we say "length and width" for X and Y, even though all axis are just length between vectors proceeding in order of being able to exist, X, Y, then Z.
If you are plotting your perspective, it will run on entirely different coordinates to an object's coordinates, i.e. Camera vs Object stricture. But in most arts and all math, we tend to model the object and it's values which we create and assign to it as attributes, not with values of how it should look from various perspectives.
I think that's the confusion. You could get used to the Z being treated as Y, but it's incomparable with everything else and you'd have to now confirm with other's that length and width are X and Z and extrusions from 2D plane are Y. This doesn't occur much anywhere else. This is the whole premise behind the meme. Arguing between standards when one is universal, the other is niche but those that have only learned the niche one are adamant the universal one is wrong.