this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

Augmented Reality (AR)

1282 readers
1 users here now

Augmented Reality (AR) related topics only (for now)

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
IronSightOS@lemmy.world
145
MSC Cruises is banning smart glasses in common areas (eu.usatoday.com)
submitted 3 months ago by 73ms@sopuli.xyz to c/augmented_reality@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

MSC Cruises is the latest one to ban smart glasses and this may be becoming more and more of a problem for people using them.

Previously in Egypt tourists have reportedly been blocked from going to see the pyramids and some museums there also ban them. Saudi Arabian authorities apparently confiscate them at the airport from arriving passengers. Anyone who needs a prescription needs to consider that they may not be able to use them everywhere.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No offense to fans, but good. Last thing we need are more devices recording everything.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not really concerned about offending them. Those things have no business being in public spaces.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

well I think the strongest case can be made for blind/deaf users that can benefit from the glasses being able to observe on their behalf and give them the information they otherwise could not have auditorily/visually.

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

valid - so we should regulate them like assistive devices and make sure there's a certificates one can show so that exceptions can be made (like bringing a guide dog into a dog-free space)

furthermore such tools should be ideally democratized and made public but realistically at least in the hands of assistive tool companies as one user with sight loss notes:

The fact that the technology is backed by Meta means they can switch off that feature at any point. It's not a tech brand made for disability. They could decide they're not supporting it anymore and just turn off the functionality. We've seen that before with other platforms.

and while i've had moments where ive been "wow it would be so cool to snap a pic right now of a thing i don't have time to pull out my phone for" - the downside of such devices becoming as ubiquitous as smartphones so we end up in an era where everyone has a camera on their face at all times sounds too dystopian to be worth pursuing imo.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

A doctor's note didn't help prevent someone from being physically assaulted the last time this stuff came up in the news:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/cyborg-steve-mann-details-alleged-mcdonald-s-assault-flna889595

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

Fair. And I agree.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

I don't own one but why shouldn't they be in public spaces? Do you think we should ban police officers from wearing body cams in public spaces? And how is it any different from my smartphone, which almost everyone is almost always holding at chest height recording level anyway?

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The bar in SF where the guy got socked over it kabashing the whole thing, is up for sale... Maybe it was the honmoon all along