this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
170 points (95.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

38763 readers
633 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hear these comments for not wanting to help people, and it feels like we're worshipping individuality to the detriment of community, which is necessary for survival.

  • "I don't want my money going to ___ ."
  • "This is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic!"
  • "You don't have any freedoms under socialism/communism."
  • "They're just looking for a handout because they're lazy."
  • "I'm a self-made man. I didn't need anyone's help."
  • "Empathy is not a virtue."
  • "I don't see how that's my problem."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Religion is not the source of our social bounds and morality rather a parasite of control left over from ancient times.

Not the person you're replying to, but I'm an atheist or an agnostic and even I'm not so sure about that.

When given the idea that there is no retribution or reprocussion for their actions, many people become nihilistic and act terribly.

I agree that it's weak to need a "sky daddy" to act properly, but many people are weak.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

When given the idea that there is no retribution or reprocussion for their actions, many people become nihilistic and act terribly.

This is what you call a sociopath. If you need fear of eternal retribution in order to not do awful things, then you're just a piece of shit.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

There is good scientific evidence that people do not think about the consequences of their actions before they commit to them.

Criminals don't think of the punishment they will receive by society but suddenly a far removed sky daddy will convince them not to rob a store? This is not how any of this works.

Morality is developed by our social bounds, otherwise every agnostic or atheist would be wildly out of control.

People are mentally weak because of religion, not despite it. It is the antithesis to critical thinking. The lack of critical thought is why our society is so easy to control.

I have seen this play out countless times in my life where people realize how fucked up their religion was once they have left it.

As their eyes open and they realize that they were being controlled by their religious leaders who abused them, they have to wrestle with the life that was stolen from them.

I am even to the point now where I no longer believe certain people need religion anymore. They need community and a sense of belonging and religious leaders like to highjack that basic need for their own selfish interests.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am even to the point now where I no longer believe certain people need religion anymore. They need community and a sense of belonging and religious leaders like to highjack that basic need for their own selfish interests.

I think I agree with basically everything you've said here and especially this conclusion. The problem is that for many the only type of these things they can find is couched in religion. As a child-free atheist, I basically have no sense of belonging nor a community.

In addition, some people's only exposure to even the very concept of morality or ethics comes through religion.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You have a community here which is probably more real and fulfilling than going to a church service. Here we are having a discussion you would never get in a typical church. We are both thinking together, discussing, without any authority to tell us otherwise.

Our sense of right and wrong simply don't come from religion. It initially comes from our familial bounds but is reinforced through our many interactions with our social groups.

You can see this in gangsters that believe in God, but also will deal drugs and shoot each other. Their morality is determined by their social group, not their belief in religion.

As I said. I used to believe like you that religion is needed by some people, but I have begun to doubt this premise.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're confusing people who say they are/consider themselves A and do/are A with those who aren't. You understand religion as a superficial, decorative thing because that's the way it has been in the West since at least the days of Nietzsche, and as such their moral relativism is not surprising at all (ethics are belief/self-determination, check is-ought problem on wiki). Doomsider, I have walked your path, I just started earlier and I'm probably older as well. Your vitriolic gut reaction has to do more with your perception of religion and religious people in a Roman Catholic plus offshoots setting (or just some hypocrites from whatever religious group) than it has to do with belief and monotheism itself, your disappointment is expected. But you haven't gotten it, you don't understand what it actually means to believe in something and live your life accordingly in a similar way you understand gravity and don't jump out of windows. Take care, merry winter solstice! 👋

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Religion is a superficial decoration in modern times. My ancestors true religion was taken from them by sword point. Convert or die, so pardon me if I view modern religion through the lense of conquerors and manipulators.

Argue, I have been married for almost thirty years. I was in your frame of mind back when I was a teenager. I spent decades studying all religions and I still do to this day. I am under no more false illusions or pretenses and have spent a long time deprogramming myself.

I am very satisfied where I have landed and I will not give credence where it does not belong.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

But that's you and your great interest in religion which probably stems from a need for something more from life than just empty pleasure, which probably means you value ideas and consistency more than others. As long as you move righteously, idc how you got there and I'm not even the tiniest amount against whatever you believe in if the outcomes are great and similar to what I'm preaching about, but if you don't see how the vast majority of people aren't like that and don't think about it for even a second, and how belief acts as a safeguard, a rail you hold onto when temptation is great, then idk, you lack appreciation for it, I guess.

Also, my ancestors were also murdered with a gun in one hand and a Bible in the other but it doesn't mean the message of Jesus or the mere concept of objective moral duty that Moses brought about/popularized aren't highly valuable. Jesus wasn't the killer, nor is he a MAGA hellbound dog beating brown people up and trafficking them like ICE and the so-called religious American government and elites, lol.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like I said, I thought like you many years ago and I have grown so much since then.

Christianity is a bad copy of other religions that came before it. Christ himself was a cultist preaching resurrection on Earth. The end of his story was just his fellow cultists trying to make his lies a reality.

It is a strange tale for sure and I study it out of morbid curiosity rather than seeking a higher truth like I once did long ago.

I wish you luck on your journey.

I don't think Jesus was preaching resurrection on earth, he was more about "give the other cheek", "rich people will have it hard entering Heaven" (in a society of poor, oppressed people), "take care of your shortcomings before you harass others for theirs", "don't be anxious". This is all almost verbatim from the Sermon of the Mount. He didn't even like people calling him good, and they made a deity out of him in a little tripartite pantheon...

Anyways, thank you, I send the same good vibes to you. 👋