this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
33 points (94.6% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
3822 readers
105 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's what they want us to think.
We can 100% require standards, send investigators, and even collaborate with other countries or coalitions like EU to spread the burden.
Countries that don't meet requirements can face massive tarrifs to equalize the playing field or outright bans.
And the US is the largest consumer of beef, China is catching up and with a low per capital consumption they can make a huge leap if they got cheap unethical meet. But they don't need to import much.
So foreign producers still need the US market, and their citizens already consume as much as us
Again, I totally agree. I just don't see that ever coming from the industry in its current form. Everyone else needs to be demanding better standards from their government. They also need to get comfortable with the idea that the cost of it will have to be shifted away from health and welfare to somewhere else, whether that's consumer prices or government subsidies. My preference would be to enforce higher standards and let the industry move away from using animals for food.