this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
818 points (90.8% liked)

/0 Governance

312 readers
268 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

We, the admin team, decry all forms of settler-colonialism, and we recognize that Zionism is a pro-settler-colonialist position.

Therefore we propose that should no longer be accepting of any Zionist accounts on our instances.

Please upvote for agree, downvote for disagree.

Note: we only count votes by instance members of dbzer0 and anarchist.nexus, plus a few vouched-for external users.


Hi mateys, I've kept things simple in the above text, for brevity, but in fact it took the admin team quite a while to get to this stage. We have discussed the policy change extensively, and a variety of different perspectives emerged. I will attempt to sum them up below as best I can:

  • The "this isn't that complicated" school of thought goes something like this: If someone is consistently posting comments that mirror Hasbara talking points (e.g. justifying the genocide in Gaza, consistently painting Palestinians as terrorists and Israel as the victim), then they should be instance banned. It's just not acceptable for Zionists to be allowed on our instances.

  • The "slippery slope" / "purity test" school of thought is that banning people for having an "unpopular" political opinion would potentially mean banning half the fediverse, if more and more of these policies were enacted over time. To attempt to mitigate this we are keeping the scope of this rule as narrow as possible, and I also don't think many of our users will be affected. Also, we typically don't have frequent policy changes, and I have no reason to expect that to change moving forward.

  • Another important discussion point was "how do we decide whether someone is pro-Zionist or not?" We can't always be 100% sure of someone's true intentions, we can only go on what they have posted and that is subject to interpretation. I don't feel there is an easy answer to this one, except to say that we would have to be pretty certain before issuing a perma-ban.

  • The "geopolitics don't matter" school of thought is that trying to be on the "correct" side of every issue is kind of pointless because nothing that happens in lemmy chat forums will ever make an ounce of difference in the real world. Don't bother moderating users over political/ideological differences, just let people argue if they want. While I can totally empathize with this sentiment, I can also see the case for taking a clear stance on this topic in accordance with our values and the overwhelming support for the Palestinian cause among our users. Personally, I am advocating in favor of the resolution.

Please add your comments below if you want to provide your own thoughts on the topic, or have any questions.

expiry: 7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeopoldBloom@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There is no right of return. Palestinians are the only group in history treated as permanent, multi-generational refugees. Every other group of refugees in history that cannot return to their country of origin is settled into their host country or some other one. Would you say that refugees of the India-Pakistan partition, or Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia should be allowed to return? What about the descendants of Mizrahi Jews who were expelled from other MENA countries after Israel was formed? Why are Palestinians the only people on earth who must be refugees forever with their own UN agency?

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

There is no right of return

This is factually wrong unless you do not recognize the UN to exist.

Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia

If only German, Czechia and Slovakia would join some kind of continental union that allowed them to at least visit their place of origin. If only, if only.

I am a proponent of a world without boarders. Being forced into camps and Gaza which is at this point and for a while an open air prison, is a starting point. If you start somewhere else, expect the internationalist, anti-imperialist Palestine solidarity movement an ally. If you just want to distract from Palestine and do nothing, go fuck yourself.

[–] LeopoldBloom@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

All countries control their own borders. If you want a one world government, you definitely shouldn't support the creation of new countries.

Can Pakistani Muslims whose ancestors fled India return there freely? Are they still considered refugees today, 4 generations later?