this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
81 points (95.5% liked)

RPGMemes

14747 readers
49 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And dnd 5e is the most aggressively mid RPG ever published

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I felt aggressively bored when reading the comments about the playtest.

Did they improve DM support? Make CR actually work? Is combat more dynamic and faster-paced? Is character creation still a pain in the ass? Did they flesh out non-combat? Do player abilities still tend to solve problems by just turning off parts of the game? Is there a clear vision for what this even is?

Oh look, it's mostly balance changes to the classes.

I'm not saying they didn't make some changes to fix my issues. I wouldn't know either way, since I can't be bothered to check, since the core audience sure did make it seem like its mostly balance changes to the classes.

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did they improve DM support? Make CR actually work? Is combat more dynamic and faster-paced? Is character creation still a pain in the ass? Did they flesh out non-combat? Do player abilities still tend to solve problems by just turning off parts of the game? Is there a clear vision for what this even is?

I'm not an expert but:

  • No
  • No
  • No (though it is faster than 3.x or 4th, mostly because you don't have any options)
  • At least there are options now. Still nothing significant past character creation, of course
  • No
  • Probably. Either that or hitting it with an axe
  • Yeah it's a love letter to second ed, with bits of third mixed in to keep angry internet nerds who never played anything else happy

I don't think 5th is the worst edition of d&d (controversially I think that's 3.x), but it is the most nothing edition. The best editions are of course 13th Age and Pathfinder 2e

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"A love letter to 2e" actually sounds a lot better than anything else I've heard about the revision. :P

Also, I have a soft spot for 3.x, but my potentially controversial opinion is that 1e is the worse edition by far.

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

1e ad&d is the only version I've not played (though I've only played basic a couple of times), so you could well be right!

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago

DO YOU HAVE A BONUS ACTION? OH YOU WANNA BUILD CLASS X? WELL ONLY LIKE 20% OF RACES WILL GIVE YOU A GOOD BUILD NOW TOO BAD. DO YOU HAVE A BONUS ACTION? TODAY WE ARE FIGHTING AN INTERESTING MONSTER IT IS INTERESTING BECAUSE IT CAN ATTACK TWICE AND HAS A NICHE ABILITY THAT NEVER GETS TRIGGERED. DO YOU HAVE A BONUS ACTION? OH YOU MOVED? WELL HERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY ATTACK BUT DON'T WORRY YOU CAN AVOID IT BY WASTING LITERALLY YOUR ENTIRE TURN EXCEPT YOU COULD STILL OPEN A DOOR OR DRAW A WEAPON WHICH MAKES TOTAL SENSE I SWEAR THIS ENCOURAGES ACTION RICH COMBAT WE ARE HAVING FUN, DO YOU HAVE A BONUS ACTION?

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 5 points 1 week ago

There's a French Actual play (Game of Roles) in which they make fun of DnD by overcoming a ranger, in two attempts, before the GM even finished to list all the attacks, bonuses, class details of the ranger. Just to show the complexity.