this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
164 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14243 readers
350 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.europe.pub 55 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That must mean either a pedestrian having not used an existing sidewalk or somebody driving their car on the sidewalk.

Any idea what is really behind this newspaperclip?

[–] Lucky_Acid@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This looks like it could very well be a very serious crime, Walking While Black. They must not have that on the books in that particular Texas county, which is why he was charged with a comparable misdemeanor. /S

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago

More likely that the cop stopped him for Walking While Black, but couldn't manufacture any charges more serious than the use of sidewalk charge.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Use of sidewalk in Texas (one of the counties listed) seems to indicate someone was walking in the road when a sidewalk was available for pedestrians. Which, ya know, seems like a safer place for doing the walking thang.

[–] mjr 29 points 6 days ago

Aren't Texas sidewalks notorious for stopping randomly and switching sides not near crosswalks? So it's far from certain it would be safer than just booking it down the shoulder for a short stretch.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 6 days ago

Which, ya know, seems like a safer place for doing the walking thang.

There was one street near me where it was indeed the opposite. The road was barely used, but pristine. Sidewalk was in awful shape, you could easily trip on the holes, and one manhole cover was bent and barely holding on, as it was actually just some metal sheet.
I only used it as a kid when I rode my bike, as it was more fun.