this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2355 readers
116 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Last substack for 2025 - may 2026 bring better tidings. Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think it's a spin on Y2K. A hypothetical moment when quantum computing will break cryptography much like the year 2000 would have broken the datetime handling on some systems programmed with only the 20th century in mind.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But... But Y2K = Year 2000, like it's an actual sensible acronym. You can't just fucking replace K with Q and call it a day what the fuck, did ChatGPT come up with this??

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a stupid fucking name alright. I guess it's a bit like any old scandal being noungate despite the Watergate scandal being named after the building and having nothing to do with water.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago

I mean it's so stupid that you had to explain to me that it's based on Y2K because it makes no sense

noungate

Yes, this is why we need to resist stupid names before they enter mainstream or the world will continue to get dumber