this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
302 points (99.7% liked)

Buy European

8047 readers
133 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

English, as an national language, is great for national communication.

But using national language for international communication is like using black-white television to watch a color movie - it kind of works, but it definitely loses a lot.

There are at least 2 important factors:

  1. neutrality: English used for international communication favors people from English speaking countries. Inside of Europe that is not to big problem, because Ireland and Malta, while being great counties, have relatively small population - so English can work as a reasonably neutral language for European communication. But when it comes to Europe in world - English is used but a country that left us and by country that wages trade war against us. That highlights that English definitely is not a worldwide neutral language.

  2. ease of use: Esperanto was designed to be easy to learn and use, while functioning very well as a mean of communication. It does not carry a burden of centuries of non-systemic evolution, so it does not have things like irregular verbs. It's grammar is very regular with simple rules. It enables creating words with a set of prefixes and sufixes so one does not need to learn a bunch of new (different) words about related things (like: to eat, to snack, to feast, food, meal, cantina, utensils, etc. - they are manฤi, manฤeti, manฤegi, manฤo, manฤaฤตo, manฤejo, manฤiloj etc). Experience shows that learning Esperanto is 5-10x faster that learning national languages. It's just much not efficient.

Than comes other factors, like pushing some way of thinking, usual for one specific nation, to all humankind, atc, but those 2 are the basic ones.

[โ€“] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Esperanto + Shavian is the constructed future i dream of.

[โ€“] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By chance, is it you who is posting this on Mastodon?

[โ€“] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, OK. Because someone was posting about Esperanto in a different writing system.

[โ€“] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

there are dozens of us! dozens! ๐Ÿ˜†