World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
...........so you don't understand treaties, or international relations, or anything like that?
You don't see why Denmark preemptively violating the NATO charter weakens their position on the international stage considerably?
Also, I'm in the US. Like I indicated in the previous comment.
You absolute idiot.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-greenland-military-denmark-nato.html
No i dont
That article doesn't give a single reason why it would be advantageous for Denmark to preemptively break the treaty.
You realize that treaties have legal repercussions built into them if they're broken, right? And that Denmark is waiting for us to incur those repercussions (like sanctions), rather than them?
If they're potentially fighting an invasion, why would they want to trigger additional hardships for themselves by breaking the treaty?
You really haven't thought about any of this, holy shit.
You’re confidently missing the point.
No one is saying Denmark should “break the treaty for fun.” The argument is about strategic preemption, not vibes. Treaties aren’t magic shields, they’re conditional frameworks that already collapse the moment an invasion happens. Yes, treaties have repercussions. That’s exactly why the discussion exists. Sanctions vs. occupation is not a hard comparison. One hurts your economy; the other erases your sovereignty. Pretending those are equivalent outcomes is absurd. And “waiting for us to incur repercussions” only makes sense if waiting actually improves Denmark’s position. If an invasion is imminent, waiting doesn’t preserve legality, it just burns time and leverage.
Also, international law explicitly allows anticipatory self-defense under imminent threat. This isn’t some Reddit-brained loophole; it’s been debated for decades. You acting like no one’s considered that doesn’t make it true.
So yeah — people have thought about this. You just seem locked into a cartoon version of how treaties and warfare actually work.
Please explain how this meets the "last window of opportunity" restriction on anticipatory self-defense.
Because the next step is troops in greenland. Good luck with that.
Anyone who can so readily throw out the principle of anticipatory self defense knows that isn't a "last window of opportunity" scenario.
Why do you want Denmark to break the law so badly?
Sp they dont roll over and give trump more ammo to conti ue to take over foreign territories. Or have you not heard. Hes now president of venezuela. Why do YOU want to wait ustil theres an entire fleet of ships off greenlands coast to begin preparing.
........because the last window of opportunity for anticipatory self-defense has been repeatedly ruled by the international community to not extend that far?
Troops massing at borders is precisely the situation that the last window of opportunity is referring to.
I'm starting to think you don't actually know the statutes involved or their previous legal cases, because if you did you'd know your "argument" is completely worthless.
https://apnews.com/article/greenland-united-states-denmark-trump-vance-rubio-meeting-cc278af4f3daf725029101966ba03568
"Anything less than having greenland in our hand is unacceptable"
You dont seem to understand trump doesnt give a fuck about your statutes or your "law". You know what makes "law". The biggest gun.
No troops massing at your border is PAST the last opportunity. You have already lost at that point. You dont seem to understand how this will play out.
This is the last opportunity.
Yup. You definitely have no idea how treaties or international relations work.
I get that it's scary that the US is doing it, but this is far from the first time world leaders have blustered about wanting territory that wasn't theirs.
The international community didn't support preemptive action even when 50,000 troops were massed on Ukrainian borders, they're not going to do it when a single US combat asset hasn't moved towards Greenland yet, and not a single policy decision has been enacted.
Edit- don't get me wrong, if we start blockading Greenland, massing naval and amphibious forces, or building up ground units on the base in Greenland, then absolutely bomb the shit out of them, but the international community will never support action before that. It's ludicrous to think they would.