this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
442 points (99.8% liked)

politics

27127 readers
2821 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ICE Out for Good vigils and rallies are being tracked online by Indivisible, the group behind the No Kings protests

More than a thousand protests are planned across the US this Saturday and Sunday after an ICE agent killed US citizen Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis this week.

“This weekend, people all over are coming together not just to mourn the lives lost to ICE violence, but to confront a pattern of harm that has torn families apart and terrorized our communities,” said Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, an organizer of “ICE Out for Good Weekend of Action”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I see zero momentum. There is absolutely no difference between an ice protest and no kings. It’s gonna be the same people. Probably fewer. Same end result—nothing.

You can be frank until you’re blue in the face, but that doesn’t change reality. You just cannot accept that this country is done, despite the overwhelming evidence.

And, when someone ruins your good vibes with reality—you lash out and clutch your useless picket sign! The tactics of the civil rights movement worked THEN. They will not work NOW.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You say this as mass protest is currently forcing change in Iran. Mass protests directly led to multiple regime changes around the world in just the last 6 months.

The only ones who don't want you to protest are those in power. Hence why places with less well enshrined rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly keep passing laws to try to ban effective methods of protest

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

You say this as mass protest is currently forcing change in Iran.

And how many people died in those protests? You need to be ready to defend yourselves and until Americans are willing to do anything with the slightest risk to it nothing will change.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was not the United States. Focus.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So...you're saying that protest which has worked and is currently to effect change in other countries, and which has worked previously in the United States, can't possibly work right now in the United States as we enter an election year?

Enjoy licking those boots!

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many people died in the protests in Iran?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the argument that you're trying to make? First it's "protest isn't effective" then it's "protest doesn't work anymore" then it's "protest doesn't work anymore in the US" and now it seems to be "but protest can be slightly dangerous sometimes?" Your arguments are disingenuous at best.

If protest wasn't effective the governments being protested wouldn't be attempting to make the protests illegal nor killing protestors and civilians.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The tactics of the civil rights movement worked THEN. They will not work NOW.

General strikes and Civil disobedience won't work now?

Kinda running out of options that don't involve guns bud.

You just cannot accept that this country is done

Oh gotcha you're just not even wanting to try anything at all. Thanks for clearing that up.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

General strikes and Civil disobedience won't work now?

Are they happening now? Or is everyone having another "We Don't Like Trump Convention" for a weekend before they clean everything up nicely and go home in time to be at work on Monday?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you doing anything other than judging others online? You are welcome to organize something.

But in context of the conversation they said that the methods used during the civil rights movement wouldn't work now. Those methods were general strike and civil disobedience. Hence why I was asking why the commentator thought they wouldn't work today

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you doing anything other than judging others online? You are welcome to organize something.

Fucking Americans. "Why isn't somebody else doing this for us?"

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah so you're not even American and are basically only familiar with what you get from the news or lemmy.

No I don't expect you to come here and fix things. Better?

Also totally ignoring what the original context was. So cool

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

No one is general striking. All to afraid to loose health care.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nothing can happen until the November election.

No Kings needs to organize and flip every red seat they can. It seems likely the House will flip. It's POSSIBLE (but unlikely) the Senate will flip.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You're not going to vote your way out of fascism. They'll just refuse to seat any Democrat that gets elected. They did that for a month already and faced zero consequences for doing so.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

November is too long of a wait

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

That's the way politics works, you get another election and vote them out.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No kings is dead. No ICE (or whatever) is gonna last a month. By October, there will be some sort of gestapo set up to disrupt elections. The post office already removed incoming timestamps for one reason—mail in vote suppression.

The future is crystal clear—I dunno how you fools keep talking about “next election” like this is going to ever end.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not sure what makes you think No Kings and 5051 are dead, they're still going and will only get stronger as we get closer to election season.

There will be a next election because elections are run at the state and local levels, the feds can't stop it even if they wanted to.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what specifically came from No Kings that we can call a victory?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Organizing 7 million people to protest on the same day was a huge feat.

To put that in perspective, the margin between Trump and Harris was only 2 million.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And those seven Million people met and then went home… So what I’m asking for is…. what happened? Nothing. What were the gains? None.

Because as far as I can tell, Trump—the self-proclaimed president of Venezuela—is going to take over another country pretty soon… Pretty sure that makes him a king.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Getting people organized is the first step, getting them to actually vote is the second. That's where we're at in 2026.

If they succeed in motivating people to vote out the Republicans, that's all it takes.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol. Organization. Voting. Come November you’ll wish you sided with action—but it will be too late.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Organizing and voting is the action.

A revolution is a pipe dream, it's not happening.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh sweetie, there is no revolution. Not with people who silence revolution controlling the conversation of the Internet.

The best you can hope for is to stay alive for the next 50 years during the Republican regime.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been alive through this before...

1969-1976
1981-1992
2001-2008
2017-2020
2025-2028

There have only been a few Democratic breaks:

1977-1980
1993-2000
2008-2016
2021-2024

It will likely flip back in 2028, but we have to flip the House back in 2026, ideally the House and Senate but that's unlikely.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It will likely flip back in 2028, but we have to flip the House back in 2026, ideally the House and Senate but that's unlikely.

JFC, that's the solution? Wait 10 months and hopefully flip house but probably not the Senate?

Then everything returns to the stagnant status quo that resulted in this situation in the first place. Dems continue to be toothless, Republicans continue to prevent anything from happening, continue to face zero consequences, and are further emboldened to go even further next time because why the fuck not? Either they succeeded in the fascist takeover or nothing happens and they just try again.

That's the best you can hope for?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's the only recourse short of a revolution or a civil war which would be 1000x more destructive.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If going back to doing nothing and kicking the can down the road is the only way to avoid a civil war then I have bad news for you: you're not avoiding anything, you're just trying to delay it for another 4 years while things continue to get worse and more people get killed.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"More people" = < 20 vs a civil war with tens to hundreds of thousands dead? 🤔

The last civil war we had killed 600,000 to 700,000 and that's without modern weapons.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The last civil war we had killed 600,000 to 700,000 and that's without modern weapons.

I agree, as time goes on a Civil war gets more destructive.

Therefore, delaying a civil war by 4-8 years will result in more destruction than if citizens stand up for themselves now. Either way, according to your arguments the civil war will happen eventually.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Citizens ARE standing up for themselves now, that's what the protests and elections are for. 😉

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Protests are only taking action if they are disruptive. Standing in a corner with signs while people go about their day is as effective as sharing memes on Lemmy.

Wait for Elections is waiting 10 months, not taking action now.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago

Disruptive protests only turn off your intended audience. You THINK you're disrupting the powers that be, you aren't, they take no notice of you and you turn away the people who would ordinarily be on your side.

[–] ineedmorecoffee@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Everything is going to be fine”

Famous last words.

So, if the dems don’t flip it in 26, you’ll eat your hat or just keep on believing a lie?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)