this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
203 points (95.1% liked)

Fediverse

38906 readers
434 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following https://tarte.nuage-libre.fr/c/fediverse/p/194717/we-need-more-users I decided to explore data a little bit more. I'm not the biggest fan of growth-as-as-target so I wanted to see how much the people were participating in the discussion.

The data

I took the data from the API explorer in https://api.fediverse.observer/ with this query:

query {  
  monthlystats {  
    date_checked  
    softwarename  
    total_posts  
    total_users  
    total_comments  
  }  
}  

Then parsed the json with this https://jqlang.org/ filter:

jq '.data.monthlystats | map(select(.total_users > 0 and (.softwarename == "lemmy" or .softwarename == "mbin" or .softwarename == "kbin" or .softwarename == "piefed"))) | group_by(.date_checked) | map( {date_checked: .[0].date_checked, total_users: ([.[] | .total_users] | add), total_posts: ([.[] | .total_posts] | add), total_comments: ([.[] | .total_comments] | add)}) | map({date_checked, posts: .total_posts/.total_users, comments: .total_comments/.total_users}) | sort_by(.date_checked) | map([.date_checked, (.posts | tostring), (.comments | tostring)]) | .[] | @csv'  

(As you see I filtered for the threadiverse. I also did the same with all software, I'll put the graph for that in comments)

Then did a good old' chart

What to think of it

I don't know. Users' activity is on the rise and I find it nice

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One thing that annoys me about each statistic about posts is that I don't know how many of these posts are actually interesting and engaged with.

For example, there is a specific instance that just mirrors reddit content and has barely any engagement. The bot posts mulitple posts per hour, mostly without any comments or upvotes.

It seems rather irrelevant to compare these posts to actually interesting posts with a nice discussion and a couple of upvotes.

My suggestion would be to count and plot the number of posts that have at least a few interactions.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

PieFed labels bots and bot-like accounts, allowing you to choose options like blur or show the content semi-transparently.

[–] cron@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

I‘m not worried about myself. It’s easy enough to block stuff I don’t like. All I wanted to say os that counting daily posts without excluding bots doesn’t make much sense to me.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, which instance?

[–] cron@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

The instance is called lemmit.online, and the most upvoted post on the whole instance is "This bot is bad for lemmy".