this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
86 points (89.1% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

2121 readers
125 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether it be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users, as it handwaves their extremism.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in arguments that lack mutual agreement.

Brigading/Trolling — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from maliciously voting, commenting, or manipulating the post in any way. This includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be banned. Good-faith and honest communication is an exception.

Tankies can explain their views, but may be criticised or challenged for them. Any minor infraction of the rules may result in a warning and possibly a temporary ban.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically last only 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction doubles the duration. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's the thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/24345496

users from meanwhileongrad are banned from dbzer0, so you won't be able to interact (which you shouldn't be doing anyway)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know the context in which IndustryStandard is replying. That was 5 months ago; my views on Israel have dramatically changed since then.

Gaza wouldn't be in the state it is now if the 7th of October massacres never occurred, if Hamas, which Israel fostered, never carried out the attacks. It'd still be greatly oppressed, but not a smoking rubble with a starving populace. The reason absolutely does matter since that's the excuse Israel uses to carry out their genocide, 'Oh, those civilians were totally just collateral! It's war! This happens despite us having the most sophisticated intelligence agency in the world'

Pointing out that Israel used the massacres as a proxy to carry out their extreme violence isn't defending Israel. It's not saying that Israel is justified, I'm not making any of those claims. Admittedly, I could've specified, so I'll do so now:

The 7th of October massacres were the triggering event that allowed Israel to pursue a level of destruction that wouldn't have been politically possible otherwise. Identifying that this is the moment the mask fell doesn't justify Israel's actions. The responsibility for the destruction lies with Israel, which is choosing to destroy Gaza. If these massacres never happened (which I need to stress, Israel's intelligence was well aware of these attacks and allowed them anyway), would Gaza be in the state it is now?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

"Hamas started it" is never a good look. It ignore a lot of context which is precisely what the person meant when saying Israel has always been an obstacle to peace.

More importantly, it's fixating on the wrong thing. The massacre x 10 000 that is genocide kind of overshadows the rest of it. Using who "started" it as an argument just comes off as trying to justify it.

Like there's a mountain of corps and half of them are children.

Here's the comment link: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20723627

It's really just that. Someone accused you of taking Israel's side and you defended yourself by saying "Hamas did it first".

[–] TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org 0 points 3 hours ago

"The massacre x 10 000 that is genocide kind of overshadows the rest of it."

Even if you included the Nakba, there is no way the IDF killed 12 million Palestinians.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You combed back 5 months into their history to find this..? That's ..weird to say the least.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

YPTB is very much obsessed with me and circlejerk themselves into falsehoods about what I actually believe in

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No. I just had it saved because it struck me as clear cut Israel propaganda at the time. You can see the little bookmark icon being selected.

It's easier to challenge the more subtle stuff if I can go back and point to a clearly pro-Israel comment, so I make a habit of saving them.

Fun fact: I'm fairly certain I actually defended goat in that thread before he made that comment.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I never said Hamas started it. The conflict between Palestine and Israel has been going on for decades. I'm saying that Hamas's actions on the 7th of October gave Israel the excuse it was looking for to carry out what's happening now.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Your reaction to being told Israel has always been an obstacle to peace was pointing that out. It comes out of nowhere, the clarification only serves to pivot the blame.

You are technically right. The problem is, so is everyone else in that argument but your technically right comes off as defending Israel.

Fact is you would never start nitpicking about any other genocide and would ban someone for making the same kind of arguments about China.

I'm going to let it go because I'm not here to harass you but I don't think your views have changed much.