goat

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

There's multiple examples of queer tankies celebrating hamas and the massacres, you can view it on this community

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It's more the irony of tankies and queerfolk celebrating and praising Hamas and the massacres. Very much chickens for KFC

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the pro-Israel side thinks this was started on 10/7/23 and the pro-Palestinian side recognizes that the war started in the 1940s and has never at any point in time stopped.

I think you shouldn't make any blanket statements.

But you're skirting the question. You're ignoring the Tankies, Hamas and celebration of the massacres. That is the key topic here.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They themselves say that what they do only applies to US politics, so reporting on Israel and Palestine is out of scope in the first place. But their definition of bias is also weird.

While this updated methodology reduces the influence of a strictly U.S.-centric political spectrum, it remains primarily tailored to the political landscape of the United States. This ensures that evaluations are relevant to a significant audience while acknowledging that some biases in the U.S. context may not apply exactly in other countries where terms like “Liberal” may have a different meaning. Readers should consider this when comparing sources with political systems from other countries.

Perhaps it's more apt to say Western than the US, but it's still generally applicable. The part about the US is also relevant to the bias, not the factuality.

They explain the overall definition of bias inside the methodology, where they compare the different kinds of bias to make the final definition.

The economic system of a news outlet depends on whether that news outlet is public, private, or government. For example, the BBC doesn't need to worry about viewership or ad revenue because it gets its funding from the government.

You can view how they rate bias on each outlet's page. Neutral language and fact-based reporting are the key defining factors for their bias.

But if you don't want to use it, you don't have to.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

i don't think anything will convince you lol.

you don't gotta use it if you don't wanna! but i am curious what you think about the main topic at hand here, with tankies praising hamas and the massacres.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Okay, what do you use then? And what makes MBFC poor? It's used in !world@lemmy.world

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The post? Yeah. It's admins, developers of lemmy, endorse this sort of content. You can see their comment in the image.

 

It was not "debunked" btw. Children were murdered during the massacres, including babies.

Of course, Tankies know this, but consider it a good thing, evidently.

If you attempt to contend anything, be sure to provide evidence and reputable sources that can support you. Don't claim anything if you can't back it up. Use this site to help determine what's reputable, aim for High to Very High and least biased.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Apologies you were caught in the brigade

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

@ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works

Ah, apologies, I double-checked and no Hexbear users are in the image. I've since edited the title.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

Oh, they both are. It's quite dire.

 

It was not "debunked" btw. Children were murdered during the massacres, including babies.

Of course, Tankies know this, but consider it a good thing, evidently.

If you attempt to contend anything, be sure to provide evidence and reputable sources that can support you.

 

And no, the article doesn't list any evidence whatsoever.

 

also downvoted for preferring democracy lol

 

Worth knowing that the defederation was because Tankies called for more Charlie Hebdo attacks on France, and later double-downed

I don't understand why extremists always try this tactic. No one believes it. Not even them. Someone should really research this. I think it's because they want to appear normie since they have to now appear better.

I also personally disavow any violence towards anyone. No one wins with violence.

 
 
 
view more: next ›