this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
870 points (94.1% liked)

Comic Strips

22346 readers
1397 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 days ago (4 children)

90's

'90s

#weDoNotPluraliseWithApostrophes

[โ€“] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but it belongs to the 90s! ๐Ÿ‘€

[โ€“] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's like, your opinion, man. It's not a universally agreed-on rule.

New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (1999):

decades should usually be given in numerals: the 1990's; the mid-1970's; the 90's. But when a decade begins a sentence it must be spelled out.

The Chicago Manual of Style (2003):

9.37 Decades. Decades are either spelled out (as long as the century is clear) and lowercased or expressed in numerals. No apostrophe appears between the year and the s.

Same goes for initialisms, e.g. CDs vs CD's.

EDIT: to be clear, I prefer no apostrophe too, I just didnโ€™t like the unnecessary condescension. One thing worse than a grammar nazi is a wrong grammar nazi.

[โ€“] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The CD's (singular) tracks and the CDs' (plural) tracks. Or would it be CD's'? That's my one gripe with putting the apostrophe s for acronyms.

But then when talking about someone getting "all As" in school, it's easy there to realize what's being said, but when someone asks "What grades did you get in school?" And you respond "As," now it's just the word as.

Grammarizing spoken word is a major part of my job and I think about this shit all the time, and sometimes things conflict, and it's dumb, it's all dumb! That's it!

[โ€“] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then when talking about someone getting "all As" in school, it's easy there to realize what's being said

Some would think that there is supposed to be a ' in there but no, the additional "s" is simply missing.

[โ€“] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I read your comment a few times before I understood it. Thank you