this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54099 readers
2889 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It's a pretty good sign that the Mexican Feds are competent and in charge. If this were a Trump-run op then it would be a shitshow, I'm sure.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

What? It's a sign that the cartels chose not to kill innocent people.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The Mexican government is a shit show, and because of their decision bringing the military into domestic affairs it's a matter of time before they live under a de facto military dictatorship.

If our administration in the US gets what it wants in bringing the military into domestic affairs here, we will suffer the same fate as the army sees the levers of power, and the weakness of civilian leadership, and subordinates or outright takes power. As sure as the sun rising.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

In previous administrations the Cartel had political power and involve the military as they saw fit. If the choice is between two authoritarian groups then I'll choose the nice lady who locks up coke fiends.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Whatdya mean? Amlo was the same party, Sheinbaum is an extension of him basically, and they've long terms I think, 6 years or whatever.

Calderon is rumored to have been put into office with the help of the cia cheating at their elections, idk if that is true but it was widely thought to be true at the time. He started the war against the cartels for the US that wanted it.

Idk about Fox, Vincente Fox, I think he was after, idk if I'm missing one. But he was more right wing. He would've been with the US on whatever they wanted more even if looking the other way on some corruption that is endemic.

But amlo was the one that brought the military in I think, or at least very much increased their involvement in policing.

So idk which two groups you refer to, and locking up coke fiends is not helpful at all, locking up violent cartels that kill people is. Coke users are just going to happen, ruining their lives for using drugs solves nothing. And I believe in personal freedom and don't think it should even be illegal as such perhaps.

Kidnapping 30 people and then beheading them and affixing their heads on cactus bordering the highway however, that is the sort of thing that needs to be stopped.