this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
264 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck AI

6040 readers
1457 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I stole this fair and square. Hope this hasn't been posted yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 29 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I hate the "Random industry is cooked" trope. Right now if you go on LinkedIn you'll find a ton of bros proclaiming the death of Hollywood because Seedance can now generate 3 minutes of incoherent eye-candy with vaguely realistic looking special effects.

It's like brainrot for boomers, you can see they are getting absolutely hypnotized by the loud noises and bright colors, and totally missing that the main character who was running to the right with blue pants is now walking to the left with red shorts.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

AI bros made Cocomelon for AI bros. Insane.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 7 points 22 hours ago

What a time to be alive, right?

[–] sleepundertheleaves 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Really, it reminds me of nothing so much as NFTs. Cryptocurrency in general, sure, but especially NFTs. Banks are cooked! Traditional mortgages are cooked! The stock market is cooked! Fiat currency is cooked! We're going to tokenize everything and transform the world! Give us all your money so you can get in on the ground floor before it's too late!

It was empty hype, and it was obviously empty hype, and it went the same place all empty hype goes.

But it let some very rich people launder a lot of money and get even richer, and isn't that the end goal of the whole economy anyway?

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This comparison is really common but i totally disagree with it.

NFTs are a total invention, the poster child of a solution looking for a problem. Nobody, anywhere on earth, ever wondered how they could get their hand on procedural art and speculate on it. The whole metaverse thing was the same way. The pure product of people who are so detached from normalcy that they can't even begin to fathom what humans tend to like and dislike in the real world.

AI has a million problems which don't need reiterating. I'm not disputing any of that. It may or may not be a technology that's viable in the long term (economically and environmentally), i won't speculate on that. But pre-LLMs there was a huge demand for better natural language processing. For semantically aware programs that are able to generalize and don't need retraining every 4 days. It was kind of the final frontier for software, the limit between "i can do that in a few sprints" and "i'll need a bunch of PhDs and 2 years of runway to possibly maybe make something work".

And i understand that final users only see the dogshit copilot integrations that they never asked for, and which are being pushed to their devices against their will, and becoming a privacy nightmare. And i understand that it's tiring to hear brain-rotted maximalists constantly making up idiotic predictions about humanity's future while they let the "groundbreaking tool of the day" riffle through their inbox and bank statements. But it would be a categorical error to believe that LLMs are anywhere as useless as, say, NFTs or the Metaverse.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

NFTs were a thing before they became associated with monkey images. They have a real use case, and arguably are the most useful thing in the whole cryptocurrency space. I know it sounds crazy, but hear me out on this. And before you ask, I don't own any NFTs.

NFTs were never meant to represent ownership rights to monkey pictures, and that is indeed a stupid use case with absolutely no utility. They were intended to represent ownership rights to tangible, real-life assets, like stocks, bonds, or land. The idea was that you could have any of these assets, which in real life typically take the form of a paper certificate or digital book entry, and then replace it with an NFT so you can do fun stuff with it. Most of the benefit comes from two properties: firstly, that everything done on a blockchain needs to be authenticated using cryptographic keys, and secondly, the calculations which occur must come from public source code which people can audit and trust (note: blockchains typically punish excessively complicated code by making it more expensive to run), and therefore automated programs can carry out many actions typically entrusted to humans.

Let me give some actual examples o real-world utility:

  • Land registry: An NFT deed can be recorded on a public blockchain. Past transfer history can be seen, and transferring that deed would require a cryptographic signature from the owner. Depending on how the system is designed, it can also be made to require a secondary signature, which could represent a notary stamp issued by a notary public. This system is much more resistant to low-level deed fraud which pops up on local news channels from time to time.
  • Public asset transfers: The land registry concept can be expanded to include everything, including bonds and stocks, all of which would require cryptographic signatures to transfer, and which leave records of the transfer, useful for law enforcement purposes or to detect fraud.
  • Virtual mortgage: An NFT can be mortgaged, and that mortgage could also be optionally crowdfunded (if the system allows for it). Interest payments would be calculated automatically, and the presence of the mortgage would encumber the deed token which prevents it from being transferred. While the technical capability exists to allow the token to be repossessed and auctioned off automatically if the mortgage is defaulted, obviously this is not a good idea to automate and there would need to be court supervision
  • Escrow: A deed token can be held by an automated escrow which transfers the deed upon payment of an agreed purchase price.
  • Collateralised loan: Similar concept to the mortgage, but can use an NFT representing some other tangible asset instead, like stock certificates and bonds.
  • Auctions: NFT deeds, bonds, and stocks can be sold at auction by automated auctioneer programs which automatically collect payment from the winning bidder and transfer the token. This can be combined with the escrow from before.
  • Stock exchange: Stock exchanges already sort of exist. They are called DEXes. But with NFTs that represent actual stock then they can operate as real stock exchanges. The benefit of doing it this way is that because everything is public and verifiable, it's easier to catch and prove securities fraud and insider trading.
  • Government bond: Government bonds can automatically pay out their interest and maturity according to the terms of the bond. They can also be pledged as collateral for loans (see above).
  • Identity control: It is possible to restrict any or all functionality for any given NFT by defining the accounts allowed to interact with it. The reason I mention this is because it is usually desirable to know who the real-life identity behind an action is. It is possible to design a system where only accounts tied to real-world identities can interact with the financial system.
[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I’m a boomer and I find this ridiculous. And by the way the more AI loving people I know are in their 20s and 30s…

Maybe easy a little bit that ageism?

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 4 points 16 hours ago

Haha don't know if i'm ai loving but i'm in my 40s if it helps. I was really using boomers as a slur to refer to dumb suits on LinkedIn, didn't mean to offend.