this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
1074 points (99.6% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8966 readers
53 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This may just be a language thing. Those aren't allergies to me, they are symptoms of allergies.

To me, allergies are things like a peanut allergy, penicillin allergy, latex allergy, etc.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The paper calls them allergies, and has a column for them. I’m going to go with what the scientists say.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

The paper literally doesnt call them allergies. It says "allergic disease", which is an effect (i.e., symptom) of an allergy.

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/pathophys/immunology/2004/misc/articles/NEJM_allergy_aller_dis_02.pdf

And like I mentioned before, 4/5 of those studies dont show an improvement due to honey over a control group. The fifth study, I can access, but it doesnt even have a control, and it's not testing just honey, anyway.