this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
424 points (98.6% liked)

History Memes

2070 readers
959 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, mosques were major centers of learning, and yes, madrasas were formal institutions of higher scholarship. No serious historian denies that. The question isn’t whether they were sophisticated or prestigious. They clearly were.

So, universities.

Madrasas generally operated through:

Endowments (waqf)

Individual scholars granting ijazahs (licenses to teach specific texts)

Study circles tied to particular teachers

Administrative oversight embedded in religious or political authority

Buddy. You just described Oxford, at least for the first couple hundred years. It's not 1:1, but it's very similar.

A single incorporated body of masters and students with collective legal standing

A standardized multi-faculty structure under one corporate identity

Degree hierarchies equivalent to bachelor/master/doctor conferred by the institution itself rather than by individual scholars

Oxford is to this day made up of 43 independent colleges that operate independently, which began as individual teachers teaching their subject. Incidentally, four of those are still today owned by religious institutions.

Do we define “university” broadly as any enduring institution of advanced learning that granted recognized credentials?

Or do we use the term in its specific medieval legal-institutional sense?

I feel like you intended this as a "gotcha," but that's literally what I mean by "no meaningful difference." Especially back in the first millennium.

If you choose the broader definition, then al-Qarawiyyin clearly qualifies very early.

If you choose the narrower juridical definition, then historians debate whether the madrasa structure fits that category prior to modern reforms.

Then you probably have to exclude every university prior to modern reforms. It's really not worth trying to split hairs for most schools.

In short, it's not a university. And that's okay. Trying to pigeonhole it into that definition is the issue.

Yeah, you really thought I was going to agree with you on the obvious answer there, but it really seems obvious to me in the opposite direction.

[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Read what I wrote. Read it again. Waste more of your time not getting it.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You're welcome to assume I'm just dumb if it makes you feel better about being wrong, but saying "just read what I wrote" when someone clearly read what you wrote is essentially just admitting you have nothing else to add but would still like to pretend that you won the argument.

To wit: if you really thought I was wrong, you'd tell me specifically how.

[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm assuming you're dumb because I've made you waste all this time responding. I was never trying to do anything except waste your time. Mission accomplished.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

Nice. I was having a good time learning, writing, and explaining stuff, so I don't feel like my time was wasted at all. So we both got what we want. Even though your goal was... really weird.